Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- history:waynebell_chat [2014/12/27 02:59] – more typos fixed digital man
+++ history:waynebell_chat [2021/02/17 18:47] (current) – [See Also] Add link to video digital man
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 look-and-feel is the only part they can evaluate.**
-Yeah, well Synchronet is quite different in the type and amount of features as
+Yeah, well Synchronet is quite different in the type and amount of features as
 well, but I guess that isn't enough either. Sad that you released ALL of your
-source code. It makes it real hard for you to tell if it's a hack or not
+source code. It makes it real hard for you to tell if it's a hack or not
-remotely. I don't give out 100% just for this reason. Someone with the source
+remotely. I don't give out 100% just for this reason. Someone with the source
-cannot get rid of the Synchronet name and version and registration number before the NN: prompt. That way they could never say it was something else.
+cannot get rid of the Synchronet name and version and registration number before the NN: prompt. That way they could never say it was something else.
 **
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 code that they don't have the source for.  In order to make it really
 difficult, you'd have to distribute too much in .obj format.  In any case, I
 don't give out the INIT or network source code, so if someone wants to not
 have any of that, they'll have some fair amount of work to do.**
 <code>
 Node  1: Dr. Seuss sent you a message:
 DM in there?
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Message: Yeah, I'll call you voice later. k?
 Node  1: Dr. Seuss sent you a message:
 Sure...
 </code>
 well, I made it very protected in that sense. The code that is distributed in
 .obj format is not replaceable at all.
 **Why?  What else is in it?**
-The entire wait for call and some significant internals are in ASM and I don't
+The entire wait for call and some significant internals are in ASM and I don't
-give a out any ASM source. Let me just say that it's also "protected". That's
+give out any ASM source. Let me just say that it's also "protected". That's
-all the detail I can give on that. On another note, I was bummed to discover
+all the detail I can give on that. On another note, I was bummed to discover
-you didn't give out technical specs on your net format, as I was at one time
+you didn't give out technical specs on your net format, as I was at one time
-going to try and implement WWIVnet compatibility. I've since changed my mind.
+going to try and implement WWIVnet compatibility. I've since changed my mind.
 **Actually, the file 'wwivdoc.zip' on my system is a tech doc on the network.**
-cool.  Didn't know it existed. I tried looking at what network code there is in
+cool.  Didn't know it existed. I tried looking at what network code there is in
 the BBS source and didn't get anywhere due to lack of comments.
 **Gee, I guess that is a kind of copy protection in itself.  I started out
 deciding to comment it, but that didn't last too long.  BTW, did you register
 WWIV?**
 Nope. Didn't run it long enough to justify it. sadly enough. I've registered
 every other piece of shareware I run here. Definitely worth $50 though.
@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
   Node  1: Dr. Seuss logged off.
-Yeah, well the world isn't a fair place and people are dishonest. If I were
+Yeah, well the world isn't a fair place and people are dishonest. If I were
 running WWIV (and using your source), I would have registered.. I think. I
 certainly don't "give out" your source. No need. It's readily available on
 pirate boards, as I'm sure you know.
   Node  3: Ant Man logged on at 2400bps.
@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
 **I didn't really expect you to say anything else.**
-Just making me feel guilty.. well... I probably should. I do have to say that
+Just making me feel guilty.. well... I probably should. I do have to say that
 reading your source was the first 'C experience I ever had. Look what
 happened? Oh no.
@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 parts got written first too.**
 yeah, I can still tell what's old in my code. I heard that you converted it
-from Pascal to C using a conversion program.
+from Pascal to C using a conversion program.
 **No, it was all written from scratch in C, although I did look at the pascal so
 source when writing some of the routines.**
-  Node  3: Ant Man sent all nodes a message:
+  Node  3: Ant Man sent all nodes a message:
   Help Me.
@@ Line 120: / Line 120: @@
 **Whatever.  I could never really get into that multi-node stuff, the few
-systems like that I've been on, it's always annoyed me when those messages
+systems like that I've been on, it's always annoyed me when those messages
 popped up in the middle of doing something.  can you turn them off?**
@@ Line 147: / Line 147: @@
 </code>
 now the activity messages won't show up and no one can page you.
 **Well, that at least is a relief.**
-yeah, I'd be flattered if you'd check out Synchronet a bit. It really is quite
+yeah, I'd be flattered if you'd check out Synchronet a bit. It really is quite
 different from WWIV externally as well.
 **Well, I've always had fun writing stuff without seeing any of the
-'competition', having written the WWIVnet stuff without seeing fidonet,
+'competition', having written the WWIVnet stuff without seeing fidonet,
 internet, usenet, or anything.  Amazing it works as well as it does.  But, I
 will probably take a look at it, if not now, then sometime this week.**
-that's cool. I am always trying to examine other BBS packages and see what
+that's cool. I am always trying to examine other BBS packages and see what
-they have and don't have. Speed is always an issue with me as well.
+they have and don't have. Speed is always an issue with me as well.
 **Well, on a BBS, there isn't much that takes very long, but whatever.**
-Well, you might be curious at the bench marks of WWIV vs. Synchronet. Just
+Well, you might be curious at the bench marks of WWIV vs. Synchronet. Just
 viewing messages or menus, searching 154,000 files for a text string or 20,000
 posts for a string (I don't think WWIV does that anyway). But there are
 certainly many things that require speed. The faster and smaller, the better.
@@ Line 173: / Line 173: @@
 important to me, although I obviously want to avoid stupid code.**
-obviously. Well you want a tour, or do you want to cut your bill?
+obviously. Well you want a tour, or do you want to cut your bill?
 **Probably better get going now, a few other things I have to do tonight.  Good
 to resolve that issue, at least.**
-yes, I appreciate your um... looking in to it. I don't want anyone (especially the
+yes, I appreciate your um... looking in to it. I don't want anyone (especially the
 author) to think I'm guilty of copyright infringement - though I would consider
 it a bigger crime as plagiarism.
 **Yeah, I'm always more concerned about that.  It really gets me when these
 people think to call it theirs when actually they couldn't even come close to
 getting something to work that well if they started from scratch.**
-Yes, very disturbing. But they say that imitation is the greatsest form of
+Yes, very disturbing. But they say that imitation is the greatest form of
 flattery. I don't believe hacking someone else's code is an imitation - it's
 plagiarism. I say Synchronet is an imitator to a degree. So I guess you should
 be flattered?
-**Well, it is as similar to WWIV as WWIV was to the Apple II "Networks" BBS of
+**Well, it is as similar to WWIV as WWIV was to the Apple II "Networks" BBS of
 so many years ago.**
-True. I believe the Forum interface is very similar as well.
+True. I believe the Forum interface is very similar as well.
 **That would be a coincidence (unless they did that from WWIV or Networks),
@@ Line 201: / Line 201: @@
   Node  3: Ant Man chatting with The Guru at 2400bps
 oh.... well glad to know that bit of history. well I'll let you go. This is
 costing some dough. Also, just curious. I read a post on your system saying
 .22 or something was going to be the last WWIV version?
 **That was true at the time, but now that Filo is handling the registrations of
 WWIV, that probably won't be the case.**
-how many registered WWIV owners are there?
+how many registered WWIV owners are there?
 **I don't know offhand.  In any case, the number who have registered is
 certainly larger (by a factor of 2 or 3) than the number still running it.**
-that's great. (I think). I forget, is there a time limit on the non-source
+that's great. (I think). I forget, is there a time limit on the non-source
 code version running as a BBS?
 **Yes - 3 months.  There is now a restriction in WWIVnet such that you can only
 be in the net, and unregistered, for 3 months, then you have to either
 register or you get dropped from the net.  Pretty effective, the number of
 registrations went up pretty significantly after that was announced.**
-So it's really a WWIVnet rregistration. If someone weren't using WWIVnet (maybe
+So it's really a WWIVnet registration. If someone weren't using WWIVnet (maybe
-a member of a smaller net using the ssame technology), they wouldn't have any
+a member of a smaller net using the same technology), they wouldn't have any
 pressure to register. Is that right?
@@ Line 229: / Line 229: @@
 (such as VBBS systems), you have to register the WWIVnet software after 3
 months ($20).  If you are using your own software unrelated to WWIV and
 WWIVnet (and there are a few), you don't have to register anything.**
 Do you want other BBS packages supporting WWIVnet internally?
@@ Line 237: / Line 237: @@
 hit 30 systems (being at 1188 now).**
-That's great. WWIV has been a pretty significant success. Is it your only mean
+That's great. WWIV has been a pretty significant success. Is it your only
 means of income? (if you don't mind me asking)
 **No, I work full-time as a programmer also.**
-How a sad. I've been working full-time (Multiuser Networked apps, Unix and
+How sad. I've been working full-time (Multiuser Networked apps, Unix and
-X/Motif, etc.) for years and recently gave up it all up to do Synchronet
+X/Motif, etc.) for years and recently gave it all up to do Synchronet
-full-time. I sure hope the income is enough. I don't like putting all that
+full-time. I sure hope the income is enough. I don't like putting all that
 creative energy into something that someone else controls the destiny of.
 **Well, the main point is that you get to play with lots of expensive equipment
 at work, and have access to a lot of stuff that I would never buy.**
-True. My last job was High-speed data acquisition on CDC M R6000 (88mhz)
+True. My last job was High-speed data acquisition on CDC R6000 (88mhz)
 machines. I wouldn't buy that on my own. I wouldn't use it either.
-**Well, I get to interface with 20 year old computers.  Maybe they're older.  On
+**Well, I get to interface with 20 year old computers.  Maybe they're older.  On
 their last legs, though.  You get a different view there, let me tell you.**
 I bet. you work with System 36s or PDP11s?
 **No, we have these old Gould machines, one day the air conditioning broke down
 and they had to shut down the computer room.  The Sun 4/380's could out
 compute them easily.  Pretty scary, they were fairly reasonable, in their day,
 I hear.**
 So were Cybers (CDC's stuff). I used to work for Control Data.
 **Well, I've never had that opportunity, but we'll see what happens.  The
 expensive stuff is now becoming pretty cheap.**
 Yeah, and software development is suffering. Bigger code (C++ is a joke) and
 faster development, because the hardware will take up the slack.
 **Well, these old Gould machines have like 64k (65536 bytes) of memory.  The
 systems we're designing for now, we do things like assume it has 256 MB of
 memory, maybe we'll have 1GB on-line memory by the time it is actually done.**
@@ Line 279: / Line 279: @@
 **and 300mips.**
 No matter what (even at 300mips), a faster program will do more
 in less time. This higher-level language idea of bigger is better, and object
 orientation will die when the scientists need more data in less time and the
-only way is better code.   Not better hardware. Someday that'll happen.
+only way is better code. Not better hardware. Someday that'll happen.
 **Well, like my father says (who is a performance manager/engineer), "all
@@ Line 289: / Line 289: @@
 spreadsheet so that they can work themselves into bankruptcy, or the secretary
 making out the coffee fund sheet), it doesn't matter.  What matters for most
-applications now is getting it out 6 months before the competition.**
+applications now is getting it out 6 months before the competition.**
 exactly. That's sad. I'm glad I had plenty of time without pressure to work on
-SBBS. My favorite computer idiot (over-user?) is "crunching numbers". They
+SBBS. My favorite computer idiot (over-used?) terms is "crunching numbers". They
-don't even know what the fuck it means.
+don't even know what the fuck it means.
 **Well, it's hard to tell.  There are some systems where you have to process a
-lot of data, but mostly, in the future, I think they're going to be going to be more
+lot of data, but mostly, in the future, I think they're going to be going to be more
-concerned with I/O. Computer hardware development now is really stressing CPU
+concerned with I/O. Computer hardware development now is really stressing CPU
 power and ignoring IO bandwidth.  Oh well.**
-true. 8mhz AT bus is such a joke - and on a 50mhz 486. What a mismatch. (this
+true. 8mhz AT bus is such a joke - and on a 50mhz 486. What a mismatch. (this
 discussion could go on forever, of course). I'll let us break it here if you
 wish. It's your bill.
-**(business expense anyway).  But, I'd better get going.  Probably call back
+**(business expense anyway).  But, I'd better get going.  Probably call back
 later this week or next to look around some.**
-cool. It's a bit of a validation (?) having you on the boards. Less people
+cool. It's a bit of a validation (?) having you on the boards. Less people
-would believe that you'd let me slide on a WWIV hack (selling it nationwide,
+would believe that you'd let me slide on a WWIV hack (selling it nationwide,
 etc.)
@@ Line 314: / Line 314: @@
 WWIVnet tech doc if you want).**
 I just might. You say 1188 nodes on WWIVnet? (That probably justifies support.
 **Yeah, and a few hundred on other WWIVnet-type networks (it seems there are
@@ Line 323: / Line 323: @@
 **No, I mean more and more separate networks using WWIVnet software.**
-Maybe they don't want a million netted posts every day. I can understand
+Maybe they don't want a million netted posts every day. I can understand
-wanting to be a part of a smaller network.
+wanting to be a part of a smaller network.
 **It's not like usenet, you only get those posts you ask for, so if you wanted
 to just be a node without any netted subs, you wouldn't have much traffic at
 all.  But, whatever.**
 It's not the traffic. They may want a netted sub that only gets netted
-messages from two or there other BBSs (local, probably) so there aren't a
+messages from two or there other BBSs (local, probably) so there aren't a
 million posts every day. I don't think the traffic is an issue. WWIVnet
 supports routing, I believe.
 **Yeah.  But, you can set up a sub yourself that only has 3 systems in it.  I do
 agree though that some number of separate nets makes sense, but there are too
 many already (as far as I can tell).**
 Probably. And there's no push for them to register if they're not on WWIVnet.
 Maybe you should integrate some sort of protection in the future.
 **Well, the two other largest WWIVnet-type networks are pushing for registration
 also, so it's not like I'm completely out in the dark.  But, I'm too paranoid
 about the protection not working, and cutting off someone that it shouldn't.
 But, really should be going now.**
@@ Line 367: / Line 367: @@
 ===== See Also =====
   * [[:history:|history index]]
+  * [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XT9QlRXYN0|Wayne and Rob interview comments regarding WWIV (video)]]
-{{tag>}}
+{{tag>wwiv chat}}

Trace:

Differences

Navigation

Search

Toolbox